Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Without any shadow of doubts, having interaction with others in the society is one of the utmost prominent needs and trends which are embedded in human's spirit. A controversial question which rises regarding this issue is what is the adequate treatment towards any mistake which made by anyone in the public? A plethora of people are inclined towards this idea that it is necessary to mention the mistake in the public immediately, while others take a radically different conviction and assert that any mistake does not worth to discuss even at the end of the class or meeting. I do believe both these aforementioned standpoints have drawbacks. Thus, I really believe that it is suitable neither we remind people's mistake right away, nor overlook we the errors of them.
To begin with, interrupting the speaker when he or she gives speech is not a desirable treatment, even in some cultures this behavior is against their beliefs. In other words, it does not seem respectful to cut the speech among vast majority of audience only to mention the any other ideas. Another reason which I do not subscribe to this opinion is that interrupting the speech to argue the mistake will take the high portion of the class time in general, and wasting the time in particular. It is controvertibly axiomatic that every meeting or class has own certain agenda, proving unrelated and irrelevant arguments in them would be an obstacle to keep forward the headway of them. As an example, take my own experience, several years ago when I worked in an oil refinery company, I participated in the conference which the speaker mad a slightly mistake about an impractical topic, one of the audiences provides a great deal of debates in that meeting. These arguments not only were far from the topic of the meeting, but also made the meeting so boring and impractical.
Another reason which deserves to say some words here is that, all of the forementioned reasons in the previous paragraph do not mean that ignoring the mistake is the better choice, whereas by turning into the error there would be opportunity not only to clear any misunderstanding, but also to learn more and share the knowledge with others. It is crystal clear mistakes are the inextricably intertwining part of every individual's performance. Ergo, in the course of the history, it is witnessed people could be able to learn more and even invent the radically novel equipment. For instance, my uncle who is one the successful manager in a well-known company, once stats that he would not have been able to reach his current fame and zenith if his employees had not indicated his mistakes in every meeting. He further explained that his employees' and coworkers' reminders pave the way of his success.
Finally, one of utmost merit of talking about problems or mistake at the end of class is that it gives the chance to people to promote both themselves and the society. In other words, if people mention the problems in a favorable climate, there will be more appropriate circumstances to take part in team working activities and seize the invaluable experiences of these constructive debates. Needless to say that human being is the social creature, being in the social is closely ties with his or he spirit. Therefore, having the adequate relationship with teacher, employee and students in the society motivate individual to be more prosperous in his or her life and inspired them to be more satisfied.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that no matter who makes an error, it is exquisite to mention the mistake amiably.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 839, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('mistake') instead of another adjective.
...in the conference which the speaker mad a slightly mistake about an impractical topic, one of the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eserves to say some words here is that, all of the forementioned reasons in the previous p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 419, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...inextricably intertwining part of every individuals performance. Ergo, in the course of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 500, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'spirits'.
Suggestion: spirits
...e social is closely ties with his or he spirit. Therefore, having the adequate relatio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, really, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in brief, in general, in particular, talking about, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 15.1003584229 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.0286738351 209% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3006.0 1977.66487455 152% => OK
No of words: 610.0 407.700716846 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92786885246 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96972615649 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81658427949 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 301.0 212.727598566 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493442622951 0.524837075471 94% => OK
syllable_count: 966.6 618.680645161 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7449203956 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.142857143 100.406767564 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0476190476 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90476190476 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145982736449 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416359642631 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336159824579 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734615745077 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432459708497 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 151.0 86.8835125448 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Write the essay in 30 minutes. We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.