Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take

Essay topics:

Increasingly, robots and computers are being used to do work that humans once had to do for themselves. Some people believe the effect of this change will be mostly positive and helpful for humans. Other people believe that robots and computers will take too many jobs away from humans who are currently paid to do them. Which view do you agree with and why?

In today’s modern world, technologies such as industrial robots, artificial intelligence, and machine learning are being developed with high speed. It is said that the job market and the kind of individuals' work are the aspects of today's life which have been affected by these technologies. With this in mind, one controversial question is that whether robots and computers may have detrimental effects on people' life and work or otherwise. I, personally, do believe that the robots have quite a few advantages and can bring a better life for individuals for two reasons that are elaborated upon hereunder.

First of all, it is evident that human error and inaccuracy are inseparable parts of one’s performance, whereas precision is the most important characteristic of robots which is measurable. In addition, robots have the ability of repeatability—that is doing the same tasks over and over again with high precision. Needless to say that fatigue, as well as the lack of accuracy and concentration in a person, are more likely to culminate in irreparable damages. For example, in recent years, medical science thanks to computers and robots have been much more advanced so much so that the riskiest and hardest surgeries, which need “high accuracy,” can be done. Therefore, is it logical to ignore the influence of robots and not use them simply because the number of doctors who perform a surgery instead of a robot will be decreased? Undoubtedly, if robots are along with people, extraordinary successes can be achievable.

The second debatable point is that although some pessimistic people think that robots can take jobs away from humans, robots even can result in job creation apart from valuable advantages for life. It is obvious that robotics need a wide spectrum knowledge—such as computer, electronic, mechanic and to name but a few. In other words, building robots is a new broad realm that numerous people can work on and make money which is nothing short of economic growth. For instance, the ones who do ordinary tasks in factories can be replaced with robots. By so doing, not only can accuracy and work speed increase, but those people can be used as the workforce in another area that tends to help the economy in an effective manner as well. Hence, the more economic growth a country has, the more prosperous life people can live.

In conclusion, given the fact that technologies such as robotics can have beneficial uses in different kinds of field, developing them might play a crucial role in ones’ lives. Increased automation does not mean individuals will be out of work or robots can take the place of humans. Rather, they can be used to refine the standards of humans’ lives and thus we should not take them for granted.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...urgeries, which need 'high accuracy,' can be done. Therefore, is it logical ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 704, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective manner" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...her area that tends to help the economy in an effective manner as well. Hence, the more economic growt...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, as well as, first of all, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 460.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07826086957 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95875554998 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55652173913 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.250666952 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.947368421 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2105263158 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8421052632 5.45110844103 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347932590174 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104091062358 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608627325255 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212837008068 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128493822141 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.