It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

Essay topics:

It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

Jobs play a vital impact on a person's life. In this world, everyone is doing their jobs like learning is a job for students, office work is a job for business peoples, and women are busy in their home and other activities. some people prefer to work for long hours and only three days a week. perhaps, According to them, doing a job for the long hour in three days will save 2 days and they will enjoy and spend their quality and precious time with family. However, other people thinks that a job for shorter hours with five days a week is more enjoyable. I certainly believe that shorter hours job and for five days is better and consume less energy.
First, people will work more actively in short hours than long hours. However, they have to work for three days but in that days they have to work continuously. Therefore, they would not actively participate in work and maintain concentration. For instance, After graduating from the school of business, I got a job in the Multinational company as an assistant manager. Initially, I was very happy that I got the job in the renowned company. The requirement of the job was working for three days and at least for 12 Hours constantly. Later on, when I started my job and realized that I took a wrong decision because I was so tired in the last 4 hours and could not maintain concentration. Due to that, I did a lot of mistakes in my work. Ultimately, I switched my job and selected the job which had the shorter hours for work with five days.
Another reason is that it will consume less energy and will enjoy the work. By considering the above example, when I switched my job to the another famous company, I enjoyed my job. Although, the pressure of work was high but working for the short hour make the job interesting and enjoyable. However, when I worked for long hours, I could not enjoy my job.
In conclusion, I believe that people should prefer the job for shorter hours with five days in a week because, not only it makes job interesting and enjoyable, also they will actively work in the job.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
Jobs play a vital impact on a persons life. In this world, everyone is doing ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...usy in their home and other activities. some people prefer to work for long hours an...
^^^^
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perhaps
... long hours and only three days a week. perhaps, According to them, doing a job for the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r long hours, I could not enjoy my job. In conclusion, I believe that people sho...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, at least, for instance, in conclusion, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.47606382979 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50605734031 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436170212766 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7399988021 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.15 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.65 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.54312042826 0.236089414692 230% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20067265115 0.076458572812 262% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117256114704 0.0737576698707 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377853302969 0.150856017488 250% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070200768497 0.0645574589148 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.