Nowadays, many movies or films are based on books. Some people prefer to read the original book before they watch the movie, other prefer to watch the movie before reading the book. Which one do you prefer?
No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the fact that people in this today’s modern world with its galloping progress are faced with different complications and hardships. Movies and books as proper entertainments could give them the sense of lively and keeping pace with their environments. As we know, many producers used stories in books for their movies which spectators might read them before or they could read it after watching. Not all people concur when this issue arises. Being cognizant to the logic behind those who repudiate or endorse the legitimacy of this contention, not having any biased perception, I presume that it is better to watch the movie before reading the reference book than reading the book at first. Among a plentitude of reasons in support of this assertion, being cost and time efficient and increasing human’s creativity and enthusiasm could be picked out for further analysis.
To commence with, a consensus has yet to be reached; however, regarding the importance of saving money and time in the fast modern world for stepping-stone for future based upon the statistics of different general questionnaires in sundry countries, people are unanimous about the conviction that watching a movie take the less time in compare to reading a book. In addition, many people have the different ideas about movies; thus people could find that does the movie their beloved or not. To elucidate on, books are more expensive than movies and they take a lot of time for their reading, while movies are not more than 2 hours in general and most of them are the free download in websites. A vivid example can be given to shed light on what was elaborated above. The results of a study carried out by Rice University’s graduate students shows that the selling numbers of different volumes of original books of Game of Thrones movies increase after showing each episode increasingly. These results show that people wait for watching serials and after that, they buy related volumes. It is obvious that they considered the matter of time and money.
In addition to the reason raised above; regarding state of art technologies for making great movies could also substantiate the justification of the claim made at the outset of this essay. In conjunction with public belief, movie makers apply different technologies in making different sequences of movies which they appeal viewers. Movies with the different sound and visual effects could make a special difference. People could imagine it in other situations and it increases their creativity. Furthermore, people encourage to buy reference books for more details after this appealing visuals. For instance, when I was a child I watched Harry Potter movies, and it was wonderful and full of mystery. These movies incite me to read their books for more details.
Drawing upon the reasons, discreetly put, as far as my personal perspective on the topic is concerned, I reiterate that watching movies before reading their original book is more profitable than the first reading book. Not only does it save the time and cost, but also increase people’s creativity and passion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In addition to the reason raised above; regarding state of art technologies for ...
^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'buying'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: buying
...eativity. Furthermore, people encourage to buy reference books for more details after ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2644.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 519.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09441233141 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7730044521 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7544887447 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52408477842 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.9064430247 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.181818182 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5909090909 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95454545455 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296888644957 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917228101356 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776979327853 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211622640148 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324073114877 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.