Students may be familiar with group work or projects since junior school and most commonly in university courses. But usually, some of them are unwilling to study in a team because they think it will disturb them and somewhat impede their study. From my perspective, it is studying in terms of the group that benefits most.
First of all, studying in a group is more effective than its counterparts. To be more specific, when students learn something new in the class, chances are that this knowledge needs some particular background which they are not acquainted with. It will make them tons of time to search for and pick up it if they do it alone. So, comparing to this less effective way, studying in a group can be more helpful since other partners in the group may have learned and known exactly this point. For instance, our team used to face a difficult modeling project about optional transportation. I was capable to deal with mathematical problems, but I did not familiar with transportation. Fortunately, Jack, a member of our team who majors in the operation system, had learned this subject. He gave us a small lecture and then we addressed this problem perfectly.
Moreover, study motivation is crucial for students. When students study alone, they may have less motivation to study since there are many lures more interesting than study, such as YouTube, Tok-Tok, and Facebook, etc. These lures can indeed lead to poor academic performance to students if students spent a lot of time on them. This can be proved by many students who got a lower level in this semester’s online alone studying at home. On the contrary, if students are immersed in a study environment that others around them all study very hard, they will be motivated by the external atmosphere and to pay more attention to study rather than entertainment.
Admittedly, it will hamper the project that some quarrels or disputes in group work. However, this gives students the perfect opportunity to develop their leadership. They can learn how to embrace diversity and how to make efforts to let the whole teamwork smoothly form this precious experience. And this quality is very imperative and requisite in their future study and work.
To sum up, I believe studying in a group is more helpful and beneficial to students as a higher effectivity, stronger motivation, and development of other crucial qualities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, for instance, such as, first of all, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98014888337 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79059150442 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54094292804 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2068655687 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5714285714 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1904761905 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244984965593 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768297113489 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463840728385 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147729817461 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438706354253 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.