Talking face to face is better way of conversing than writing email and text massage.
In modern era, advancement in technology gives various choices to human for communication. People use variety of way to talking with other people, it is depend upon time and locations. From my vantage point, talking face to face is good way of conversing than writing email and text massage because of it is easier way, save time and help to make better decision.
To begin with, in many place require to face to face discussion because easier way than writing. For an example, I m working in marketing company, every week my boss conduct meeting in which all people have to attend this. Talking face to face is easier to all people gives their own opinion at time. Furthermore, writing email or text massage to each people consume more time and also wait for each person response is wasting of time. It is better to talking face to face is save time and easy way of conversing.
In addition, face to face communications more effective and help to understand the talk. For an instance, in the nine grades, I was failed in Maths subject, that time I was really nervous and disappoint to my performance. My cousin talked with me for 2 hours and he encouraged me to retake exam, firstly I said no I not agree with give exam but after he convinced me and finally, I gave the exam. His motivation helps to me for passing the exam. Therefore, massage and email not get too much attention as like face to face conversion.
However, writing email and text massage use for short talk such as give massages to unknown person or known person without meet them. Many times a person cannot meet the other person because live in different states or countries that time uses the text massage is better way than meet that person. Still, I affirm with my point of view that face to face conversation is better understanding, easy way and more influential.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, talking direct is not only save the time but also most effect conversation than other ways. That are reasons I certainly agree with the statement that it is better to talk face to face than writing email and text massage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...way to talking with other people, it is depend upon time and locations. From my vantag...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'message'?
Suggestion: message
... conversing than writing email and text massage because of it is easier way, save time ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun place seems to be countable; consider using: 'many places'.
Suggestion: many places
...ake better decision. To begin with, in many place require to face to face discussion beca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 38, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
.... To begin with, in many place require to face to face discussion because easier way than writ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'message'?
Suggestion: message
...ime. Furthermore, writing email or text massage to each people consume more time and al...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 33, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'message'?
Suggestion: message
...rsion. However, writing email and text massage use for short talk such as give massage...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 253, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'message'?
Suggestion: message
...es or countries that time uses the text massage is better way than meet that person. St...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: MASSAGE_MESSAGE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'message'?
Suggestion: message
...ace to face than writing email and text massage.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, really, so, still, therefore, in addition, in brief, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66933333333 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5833710965 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482666666667 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2738842996 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2777777778 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517405817095 0.236089414692 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193303237153 0.076458572812 253% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183112632136 0.0737576698707 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353021762588 0.150856017488 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113747964822 0.0645574589148 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.