Having a long and continued relationship in our personal or social life has become a main objective of modern people. Some believe that in order to have a permanent friendship, people should always tell truth. Others, on the other hand, disagree with this notion and have the opinion that other factors such as being intelligent and having a sense of humour is equally important and telling truth would sometimes bring about the end of relationship.
To start with, being honest to our friends, partner and parent does not always result in having a positive and last-longing relationships. In some situations, we might not tell the exact truth. I can remember a personal experience here. About, 1 year ago, in January 2016, my partner purchased an expensive dress from high street located in Australia. She spent more than 300 dollars for just an evening dress. When she came back home and showed that dress to me, it was not designed so well and even it was not beautiful on her. I was going to tell her how she was stupid to pay such this hefty amount for this worthless dress. However, in a moment, I just grasp that she wanted compliments of how she is tasteful and wise to buy such a bargain like this. Subsequently, I changed my mind and started to admire the dress and her choice. She suddenly became very happy and satisfied. As this example shows if I told her the truth, probably now I would be single. There is always such this white lie which would help have a long and happy relationships with our wife and friends. Therefore, telling always truth does not necessarily mean having a long relationship.
In addition, there are other factors which guarantee a long-lasting friendship such as being intelligent and reliable and having a sense of humour. In most circumstances, the first step to make a friend might be having a funny characteristic. I have known a lot of friends who are very humorous and when I spend time with them we always laugh and we can not notice the pass of time. Modern people are now very engaged with their work and life and they prefer to have such funny friends whom can relieve the stresses and strains they have undertaken during their routine life. Another significantly important characteristic would be reliability. We need to have reliable friends and parent whom we can trust on them in critical conditions and when we face problems in our life. I remember how my parents were supportive when I was without any jobs around 6 months ago. They loaned me a considerable amount of money so I could survive during those difficult times. My friend was also very helpful and tried to find a suitable post for me. Fortunately, he was successful to encourage his manager to give me a temporary job until I would find a permanent occupation.
In conclusion, although honesty is an important characteristic for having a long relationship, it is not always a factor which results in having a happy relationship. In some circumstances, it is not worthwhile to say the truth and it is recommended to say some white lies. Moreover, having a humour personality and being reliable are equally important, guaranteeing a continuous and lifelong relationship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1018, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to have' or 'have'.
Suggestion: to have; have
...ys such this white lie which would help having a long and happy relationships with our...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2648.0 1977.66487455 134% => OK
No of words: 550.0 407.700716846 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81454545455 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84273464058 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86177659667 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498181818182 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 818.1 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5219814457 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3103448276 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9655172414 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34482758621 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117437480569 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355397378598 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382760893734 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876424497858 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337814408188 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.