Without a doubt, some people would affirm that internet provides valuable information while other may contradict this point of view, sustaining that actually the overwhelming amount of information creates problems. As far as I am concern, I believe that both statements are correct. Internet provides valuable information, but in excess, and not all the information online is accurate or correct. Thus, is my opinion that internet is a tool to use with responsibility and a good filter to analyse the legitimacy of each information with good criteria.
First of all, internet became a everyday tool to access information, communication and working support. Moreover, internet is today a indispensable tool for support in mostly every activity you can think about. For instance, police officers include a computer in their police cars connect by internet to the police server that are giving in real-time information regarding some suspect. In this case, I support the idea that internet provides valuable information.
Secondly, on the other hand, internet offers an infinite possibility of sites that may expose the user to fake, exaggerated, or malicious information. The lack of control or inefficient control regulation of the content online, brings an excessive amount of wrong or prejudicial data. To illustrate this point, let's analyse the health sites that offers information about all kind of treatment for different illness or medical conditions. People, not aware of an illegitimate site, could follow a dangerous advice with terrible consequences. Thus, in this case I support the claim that not only too much information, but also wrong or malicious information, could creates problems.
Finally, I consider Internet a tool that need to be approach with responsibility and good balance between what information is needed and how legitimate or valid the site bringing that information could be. Consequently, I suggest to do a little research over the site consulted, before give for granted the data published there. For instants, if we are reading an article it is important to see if it is signed, and by whom. Looking for that person and its professional history in order to know more about him or her would give us an idea of how trustable he or she is.
In summary, based on all the argument exposed above, I firmly believe that internet is a tool that people should handle with responsibility aware that not all published there is accurate or real information, but without any doubt, I also consider that internet is one of the most amazing invention of our times.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...teria. First of all, internet became a everyday tool to access information, co...
^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ng support. Moreover, internet is today a indispensable tool for support in mostl...
^
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'dangerous advice'.
Suggestion: dangerous advice
...e of an illegitimate site, could follow a dangerous advice with terrible consequences. Thus, in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...o wrong or malicious information, could creates problems. Finally, I consider Intern...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest doing'.
Suggestion: suggest doing
...t information could be. Consequently, I suggest to do a little research over the site consult...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in summary, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21052631579 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99744631588 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2336395961 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 5.45110844103 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263989606066 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807064109561 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679351406908 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144301174535 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774359799736 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.