The reading and the lecture are both about the Torreya taxifoha, which are types of tree that facing the possibility of extinction. The author of the reading provides three solutions to solve this problem, but the lecturer casts doubt on each one of them.
First, the article argues that one possible solution is to reestablish the tree in micro climate, which a climate that is different form the climate around it. The professor, on the other hand, refutes this suggestion. He explains that this area has witnessed a change in the climate and it became drier maybe due the global warming. Hence, the conditions for the flourishing of this tree do not exist in that area and the whole process would be susceptible to failure.
Second, the text says that another possible solution is to relocate the tree in completely new area with colder weather which suitable for the growth of the plant. The speaker, in contrast, rebuts this claim by providing an example of similar case about another plant. She elaborates by stating that in other cases when some plants have been moved form its original habitat, it dominated the whole new area. The other types of plants became fewer or even extinct.
Third, the author of the reading proposes another solution which is to grow the tree in the research labs where it can be protected and put under more investigation. The lecturer, however, goes against this idea by saying that it is not practical. He added that that tree needs to grow in large size and be genetically diverse to be able to flourish normally. That condition is nearly impossible inside the research labs. Besides, its ability to resist diseases will decline to a great extent. Hence, this solution is not feasible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture are both about the Torreya taxifoha, which are ty...
^^
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut the Torreya taxifoha, which are types of tree that facing the possibility of e...
^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding climate'?
Suggestion: the surrounding climate
... which a climate that is different form the climate around it. The professor, on the other hand, refu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, third, in contrast, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 295.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87796610169 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47440445189 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55593220339 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3477074937 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9375 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0193075277418 0.236089414692 8% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00598679896871 0.076458572812 8% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.010418662435 0.0737576698707 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0110149482715 0.150856017488 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0076173322685 0.0645574589148 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.