A glance at countless forms of media in modern world brings to light a problem that has several times provoked discussions, that is, whether it is necessary for people to refer to many different new resources to be well-informed. Some might contend that using too many news resources is a waste time. However, I would like to suggest getting information from different resources keeps us with speed, convenience and objectivity.
First and foremost, different platforms have different advantages in terms of news-telling. With the advent of technology, people have more and more ways to get information, and they are actually playing their distinct roles in today's life. Radio, for example, can be useful for drivers, bringing the latest news to its users when they can not spare time to read or watch. TV programs, as a main source of entertainment, show vivid pictures of the on-going events in any part of the globe. Newspapers, a source should not be ignored, carries huge amount of information, telling news stories with remarkable details as well as background and commentaries.
Secondly, it is widely acknowledge that people's minds are shaped by what they read and see on a daily basis. Since currently many news reports are biased intentionally, it is advisable for people to go through various news source for objectivity. If they only receive information from a single source, they are highly likely to be misled by a particular ideology, which would absolutely narrow their vision and let the percept some wrong or even radical thoughts. Conversely, if people have the chance to read about something from different or even contradicting perspectives, they will be able to form their own judgements.
Finally, an additional argument comes to mind is that as the increasingly connected world has rendered it a hard task for a single news source to cover all the news. For instance, local news media only cares about the events around the city, whilst an economic magazine is specialized in financial news. Were people to get sufficient amount of information, they would have to look at it in different new resources.
Due to aforementioned ground, it is worthwhile for people for to pay attention to different news resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... it is necessary for people to refer to many different new resources to be well-informed. Some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...tertainment, show vivid pictures of the on-going events in any part of the globe. Newspa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'acknowledged'.
Suggestion: acknowledged
...commentaries. Secondly, it is widely acknowledge that peoples minds are shaped by what t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[2]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: Where; We
...azine is specialized in financial news. Were people to get sufficient amount of info...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, conversely, finally, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12534059946 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96093902364 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569482288828 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6847637329 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5625 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182809277063 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650611437715 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330312671852 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10992803402 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033593448488 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.