Teachers are the role model of their students. Whether they should make their social or political views known to students is a controversial issue. Some people are inclined to the idea that teachers should express their social and political views to students. Others have exactly the opposite point of view. I firmly concur with the argument and assert that students should keep their students away from their social or political thoughts.
First point to take in consideration is the rational use of classes time. The prime role of teachers is to transfer knowledge to students about academic topics. Therefore, if they going to talk about social and political topics while giving lectures, will takes the valuable time of the class.Some may argue that, an important role of teachers is to shape the future of students, that can not justify wasting their time discussing other topics. It`s best for both students and teachers to focus on academic lectures rather than to have conversations about social or politic subjects.
Another aspect to point out is the immaturity of students. Usually youth are not mature enough to distinguish between the right things. As a result if their teachers tell them about their personal social and political views that will influence their thoughts. An article in a recent news paper says that 80% of students who had politic or social discussion with their teachers are most likely to adapt the same point of views as them. It`s is better to let students discover the social and political world by themselves in the right time.
In conclusion, teachers should focus only on how they can increase their students performance in school rather than to waste their time and influence their thought by useless social and political discussions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'take'
Suggestion: take
...ical topics while giving lectures, will takes the valuable time of the class.Some may...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...ll takes the valuable time of the class.Some may argue that, an important role of te...
^^^^
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...the valuable time of the class.Some may argue that, an important role of teachers is ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 284, Rule ID: NEWS_PAPER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'newspaper'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: newspaper
... their thoughts. An article in a recent news paper says that 80% of students who had polit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 292.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15753424658 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54609411327 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503424657534 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.391452406 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274150042181 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110593102439 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833332950826 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193737518789 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776822544061 0.0645574589148 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.