I certainly believe that teachers should not make their social or political thinking known to children in the homeroom. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The explanations go as follows.
Firstly, teachers should mislead students by showing off their social or political views. Talking about social or political occurrences would be a very sophisticated and hardship task. There are a lot of experts and researchers who study hard enough in laboratory or library to comprehend events like presidential election, bank robbery, or increasing rate of crime. Sometimes, they have to gather and share each other’s findings to offer a suitable interpretation and solution. Because all of these, most of the teachers do not have a sufficient eligibility or skill to speak about social or political happenings. So any idea and data can lead students to a wrong direction or decision.
Furthermore, wasting pupils’ time is another noticeable support. Nowadays, the world alters very swiftly and all youngsters and olds experience a huge progress and improvement in several fields of science and engineering including transportation, communication, health caring, and even artificial intelligence. In this quick advancement any time wasting can delay or jeopardize students’ success. In other words, it is better for teachers and students to concentrate on the main topics. For instance, in a computer class, the main duty of teacher is to talk about digital instruments such as smart phone or television.
Admittedly, there are some justifications by one who argues that teachers should let students know about their social or political views. Chiefly, it may extend students’ experience. All teachers gain a valuable and worthwhile social and political knowledge during several years. This would be a great opportunity for children to broad their horizon or information and prepare for future careers or responsibilities. However, still I affirm that teachers should not reveal their social and political thinking in a class. Although students possibly learn something new, they can take this time to consider the topics and materials more deeply and reach to a profound understanding. Besides, students can learn so much about those mentioned subjects in Society and Political class.
Due to aforementioned ground, all folk should bear in mind that instructors should not reveal their social or political ideas in a class. Participation of misdirection and time consuming are two prime and conspicuous reasons.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
Some subClauses wanted.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 392 350
No. of Characters: 2090 1500
No. of Different Words: 228 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.45 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.332 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.003 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 160 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 126 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 95 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 59 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.043 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.849 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.391 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.291 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.484 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.034 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'while', 'for instance', 'such as', 'talking about', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266219239374 0.229887763892 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.114093959732 0.158761421928 72% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109619686801 0.0866891130778 126% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0492170022371 0.046263068375 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0268456375839 0.0685040099705 39% => OK
Prepositions: 0.089485458613 0.118717715034 75% => OK
Participles: 0.0156599552573 0.0351676179071 45% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.18478423683 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0268456375839 0.0309702414327 87% => OK
Particles: 0.00223713646532 0.00188951952338 118% => OK
Determiners: 0.0782997762864 0.0887237588012 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0313199105145 0.0209618222197 149% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00447427293065 0.0139019557991 32% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2560.0 2387.08602151 107% => OK
No of words: 392.0 408.028673835 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.5306122449 5.86048508987 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.433673469388 0.338922669872 128% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.331632653061 0.251872472559 132% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.270408163265 0.174417080927 155% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.176020408163 0.112833075102 156% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18478423683 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.524397521467 109% => OK
Word variations: 66.6561457148 59.2087087015 113% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0434782609 20.5533526081 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1275026274 48.84282405 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.304347826 120.699889404 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0434782609 20.5533526081 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.608695652174 0.644075263715 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 50.206743567 45.7405998639 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.95294117647 1.45489161554 134% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420933892839 0.300154397459 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0546146722948 0.103427244359 53% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0535105170193 0.0752933317313 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.452646724099 0.497263757937 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.110130268601 0.151897553556 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141867334083 0.114077575197 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777229685078 0.0781384742642 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.324403550771 0.336927656856 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0236871203262 0.067059652881 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282221624752 0.210909579961 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533387537659 0.0618886996521 86% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.75985663082 254% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.