Nowadays, enhancement of demands makes things much quicker than last decades when there was less population in the world. Some people believes it is significant to work faster and risk making mistakes than work slowly and take care of everything. In my opinion, I support the statement because of elevating the demands and competition among companies.
First, the population has increased in the recent years which means highly demands for various things. So, an employer should work faster in the companies that provide risks to produce the unqulified product. To give an example, China has built several shoe companies entire the country and manufacture thousand pairs of shoe each day. The worker should make them in short times. Hence, the quality of shoes drops over the quantity due to the pressure of quick work.
Second, each company wants to import more product to foreign countries which help them earn more income. In addition, companies compete to send products and force their employer to work until midnight. They might be exhausted due to rising pressure of their work and makes mistakes.
In conclusion, working quickly elevates the rate of mistakes due to the progression of demand and competition between companies. I believe that it happen across the entire word.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...nies entire the country and manufacture thousand pairs of shoe each day. The worker shou...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, so, in addition, in conclusion, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 1977.66487455 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 208.0 407.700716846 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21153846154 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.48103885553 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52590132721 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639423076923 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 618.680645161 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3398364127 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.3846153846 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233192452808 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770316068128 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643377393275 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13607036808 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050144779938 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 86.8835125448 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.