I do not agree with the above statement. Living in a modern world where things are developing fast and changes take place from time to time, it seems that time and efficiency is the first priority. Nonetheless, today's world is so complex, connected and competitive that mistakes are almost intolerable, and we should be aware of the fact that speed is not efficiency.
To begin with, it has always been a misconception that speed is desired. Students are required to finish homework and tests in a limited time, engineering projects are expected to be accomplished with speed. These days, the importance of speed cannot be more emphasized, but this notion no longer fit modern world. People want things to be done well, rather that quickly. Being quick is only one of the many aspects to do things well, and it is definitely not the most important aspect.
What is more, the development of science and technology has provided human with much power that has to be handled cautiously. For example, the construction of an airplane requires quality and precision, instead of speed. The faster the project goes, the more likely that mistakes would occur. In an airplane, even the slightest error could lead to a catastrophe. So, in such industries that require high level of technology, work fast and ignore mistakes is undoubtedly unwise.
Last but not least, taking the risk of mistakes could also be disadvantage for individuals. As cooperation becomes a vital concept in today's world, few people work by themselves. It seems that those who work quickly are ideal to work with, but speed does not necessarily mean efficiency. In fact, cooperation is vulnerable to errors. A single mistake in one' s work can affect others', and this mistake can be difficult to figure out. Thus, working rapidly can backfire, making it harder to work with others.
In conclusion, though the pursuit for speed has been long and has become even more strengthened in today's world, working fast and taking risk making mistakes at the same is actually unwise and dangerous, for it could lead to the opposite. Instead of doing things better, it may result accidents and even disasters, and can also impede individual development.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1846.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0027100271 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74695704712 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4427323933 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9047619048 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.80952380952 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243640857438 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722252851866 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595346455794 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13310217862 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524569736076 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.