The article stats that about some evidence about animal fossils from their remained tissues. However, the professor explains that this tissues evidences should be identified clearly and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that many small branching channels may correspond to hallows in the bones where blood vessels were once located. The professor refutes this point by stating that soft blood tissues may belong to some other organs like lung. He provides an example in lung bacteria they may make a colony in hollow.
Second, the article stats that microscopic examination shows that red blood cells may be existed in hollow and reveal some mineral element like iron in bones. In contrast the lecture says that they are, in fact, iron is a volcanic material and may exist in some other places. He says that the probability of blood cell is low in terms of seeing iron by examination.
Finally, the author declines that collagen is explored in leg bone by examination. The professor says that this idea is problematic. He agrees that collagen is an very old factor and it is improbable that comes from just animal tissues. He gives an example to illustrate that human skin have collagen too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s. However, the professor explains that this tissues evidences should be identified ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'hallow'.
Suggestion: hallow
...ll branching channels may correspond to hallows in the bones where blood vessels were o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... mineral element like iron in bones. In contrast the lecture says that they are, in fact...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...problematic. He agrees that collagen is an very old factor and it is improbable th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 1977.66487455 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 205.0 407.700716846 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04390243902 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.48103885553 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48790052423 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 212.727598566 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 618.680645161 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.614425612 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1666666667 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.