Throughout history, in all civilized societies, seeking for happiness is one of the most momentous issue among people. Whether modern life can proliferate contention and delight in human's life, has engendered copiuos controversies among people. It goes without mentioning that different people with discrepancies in insights, interests, levels of education and background might hold miscellaneous perspectives in this regard. In spite of the fact that a concrete argument can be made to oppose the notion, I, on the contrary, concur with the idea that despite the availability of excessive amenity features, people used to be happier in the past. The following paragraphs represents conspicuous reasons to elaborate my case.
First of all, one should take into account significantly the high speed technology. As a matter of fact, the primary culprit for not being happiness is as much as previous people is cutting edge-technology. Furthermore, thanks to the science and scientists hard-wrking, technology has been soared and enriched more than the infant steps. On the other hand, human beings are hard-wired to keep up with this pace. When they accustomed to one gadget, the new one has been devised, and they have to be adapted to the second one too. This sequence has been continued for some epoch. An entelligible noteworthy statics revealed by a recently conducted survey in our country, Iran, reavealed that about 80 percent of people clamor for being incapable of cope with gadgets. Ironically, while technology has designed to sreamline peole's life, It may be counterproductive. Therefore, this could cause dissatisfaction in life.
Another equally noteworthy reason in corroborating my stance is the invasion of state-of-the-art inside people's life. Although, at first, scientists belive that technology would be an option for facilitating life, gradually it becomes an ingrained part of human's life. In fact, nowadays without exploiting of it, many routine affairs can not be procured well. Moder life offers abundant examples of families disputing about daily activities. In fact, technology has influenced both personal and social life. Even it can be seen that it affects people closest relationships, between apouces. While, in the past, people used their own intellectual to solve their issues, which is the core of human beings's success in universe.
In the end, with all being discussed above, and contemplating over all influetial factor, I am left to draw one single conclusion. Although in many facets of life tecnology assits people to live much improved than previous generation, it contributes to dissatifaction among people since they can not deal with it. The excessive pace of new-published gadgets and intude to personal life are the main cause of this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 679, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'represent'.
Suggestion: represent
...r in the past. The following paragraphs represents conspicuous reasons to elaborate my cas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adget, the new one has been devised, and they have to be adapted to the second on...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could cause dissatisfaction in life. Another equally noteworthy reason in cor...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...roborating my stance is the invasion of state of the art inside people apos;s life. Although, at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'people the closest'.
Suggestion: people the closest
...fe. Even it can be seen that it affects people closest relationships, between apouces. While, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'in fact', 'as a matter of fact', 'first of all', 'in spite of', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235976789168 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.160541586074 0.158761421928 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.1083172147 0.0866891130778 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0328820116054 0.046263068375 71% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0348162475822 0.0685040099705 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145067698259 0.118717715034 122% => OK
Participles: 0.063829787234 0.0351676179071 182% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.94724014797 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027079303675 0.0309702414327 87% => OK
Particles: 0.00193423597679 0.00188951952338 102% => OK
Determiners: 0.0773694390716 0.0887237588012 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0193423597679 0.0209618222197 92% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00580270793037 0.0139019557991 42% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2832.0 2387.08602151 119% => OK
No of words: 448.0 408.028673835 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.32142857143 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.397321428571 0.338922669872 117% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.296875 0.251872472559 118% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216517857143 0.174417080927 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.162946428571 0.112833075102 144% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94724014797 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584821428571 0.524397521467 112% => OK
Word variations: 72.4821770258 59.2087087015 122% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 18.6666666667 20.5533526081 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9004358052 48.84282405 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 120.699889404 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.5533526081 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.644075263715 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 48.3541666667 45.7405998639 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.94915254237 1.45489161554 134% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276581110663 0.300154397459 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0607165681357 0.103427244359 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0335951172895 0.0752933317313 45% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.409592811998 0.497263757937 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124781331404 0.151897553556 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952731233105 0.114077575197 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675750166129 0.0781384742642 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.369905303849 0.336927656856 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0388485968044 0.067059652881 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21364350049 0.210909579961 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047435324575 0.0618886996521 77% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.91756272401 224% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 10.0 2.75985663082 362% => OK
Total topic words: 22.0 13.6433691756 161% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.