I believe that, each one of these solutions has its own negative concepts, and as a result, none of them are the best. Interrupting and correcting the mistake right away may cause a confusion for the teacher or the meeting leader about their plan and disturb the class discipline. Also, talking about the mistake after the people are gone is not the best choice, because the other students do not realize it and they may repeat it again in their exams. Besides, the third solution is always wrong. I would betray to other students, if I find out an error and do not ask. Thus, in my opinion, the best approach would be to wait for the questionnaire section in which the teacher or the meeting leader allows students to asks their questions.
Interrupting and correcting the mistake immediately could not be the best approach, because it may cause a mass confusion for the teacher or the meeting leader about what he or she is going to say. I believe that, it would be very rude to ask our questions without any permission. Also, by correcting the mistake right away, the classroom or the meeting discipline would disturb.
Although many people would prefer to choose the second solution, I believe that, it could not be the best option. If we wait until the class or the meeting is over and then talk about the mistake with the teacher, the other students, who have gone before, would not find about what the mistake is and as a result, they may repeat it again in their exams. Also, we miss the chance of having an interaction with other people about our thoughts.
In addition, the last approach would be always wrong. I believe that, it is kind of treason to other people, if we realize the teacher or the meeting leader have a mistake and say nothing, because it is possible that no one else finds out. Therefore, if you decide to say nothing, it will be remain and may cause more mistakes.
In conclusion, I believe that, none of these approaches are not the best solution for what the topic says and I reject all of them. In the first option, interrupting and correcting the mistake right away can cause a disturbance for the class or the meeting discipline and make the teacher or the meeting leader confused about what he has plan to say. Moreover, in the second one, if we wait to ask our question until the class is over, the mistake would be remain for other people, who have gone before and they may repeat that mistake again in their exams. Furthermore, if we find an error and prefer to say nothing, we would betray to others, because they may miss the chance to make it correct. Hence, in my opinion, the best approach would be to wait until the teacher or the meeting leader finishes his speech and then ask about their questions in the questionnaire section.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'planned'.
Suggestion: planned
...eting leader confused about what he has plan to say. Moreover, in the second one, if...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, talking about, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 500.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41165171615 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.356 0.524837075471 68% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1127436506 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05 5.45110844103 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.85842293907 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214647275358 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829003020882 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078150200313 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153009666015 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607439772921 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.