There are certain considerations or factors that everyone can take into account to examine and investigate people’s opinion. I certainly prefer to Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The reasons why I support this idea is discussed in the following passage.
Firstly, the main reason is being polite and respectful. In my opinion, people should respect each other in any situation. Many people from all over the world believe that interrupting would be rude and impolite. Additionally, in serious and important events such as conferences people want to show themselves gentleman. So by introducing themselves as a rude person they may loose their position or relations with outstanding and well known people. For example, many business and professional contracts sign after conferences. Generally, companies managers do not want to hire impolite staffs. Consequently, who correct lecturer errors between the talk would loose many opportunities.
Moreover, recent researches by psychologists show that people loose their focus and can not be able to continue their talk anymore when somebody interrupted them suddenly. In fact, being focused is an integral part of a good presentation. Therefore, telling something during the lecture may be disturb speakers concentration.
Finally, almost every meetings and conferences have limited time. Therefore ,correcting lecturer’s mistake could waste his or her time. In other words, we may disturb meeting leader by interrupting him. For instance, landscape architecture’s conference allow people to present their posters 15 minutes. In this short time everyone should talk about their research and give introduction, body and conclusion. Besides, if audience tell them their opinion or correct them they can not finish their talk and conference manager may cut their presentations unwantedly.
Due to aforementioned ground, I think that all folks should bear in mind that if the meeting leader said something wrong, tell him or her after the meeting. Participation of politeness , being focused and limited time are three prime and conspicuous supports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople's opinion. I certainly prefer to Wait until the class or meeting is ov...
^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ng themselves as a rude person they may loose their position or relations with outsta...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 661, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... lecturer errors between the talk would loose many opportunities. Moreover, rece...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 63, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...rches by psychologists show that people loose their focus and can not be able to cont...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... may be disturb speakers concentration. Finally, almost every meetings and confe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...conferences have limited time. Therefore ,correcting lecturer's mistake could...
^^
Line 15, column 185, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the meeting. Participation of politeness , being focused and limited time are thr...
^^
Line 15, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iteness , being focused and limited time are three prime and conspicuous supports...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59710144928 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10904351187 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626086956522 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2761260832 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.9565217391 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69565217391 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107175401542 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300439214319 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337465667928 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614285342849 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234180266931 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.