tpo integrated 25
The lecture and the reading both discuss the clay jay excavated that have copper cylinder. The reading states that the vessels were not use as batteries and enumerates three reasons of support. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that the there are probability that the copper cylinder were using to conduct electricity.
First of all, the reading argues that. The absence of wire is proving that the cylinders were not used to conduct electricity. The lecture disagrees. It claims that the clay jay was excavated by local people. According to the professor, local people may think that the wire and other stuff found near the copper cylinder are not such important.
In addition, the reading states that there copper cylinder looks like other jars were used too holding a scrolls. However the lecture opposes this point by saying that the same shape of the cylinder is not prove that the copper cylinder are not conducting electricity. Furthermore, iron rode plus any liquid could produce electricity. The copper cylinder could adapt to any purpose.
Lastly, the reading makes an argument that their no need for electricity during the ancient period. But, the lecture refutes. It claims that there is an invisible power for using the copper cylinder. For example, the copper cylinder may be used in medical treatment, such as major healing, or stimulate the muscles, or even relieve aches or pain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'used'.
Suggestion: used
...eading states that the vessels were not use as batteries and enumerates three reaso...
^^^
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...nd enumerates three reasons of support. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a scroll' or simply 'scrolls'?
Suggestion: a scroll; scrolls
...s like other jars were used too holding a scrolls. However the lecture opposes this point...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...r jars were used too holding a scrolls. However the lecture opposes this point by sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'proved', 'proven'.
Suggestion: proved; proven
...t the same shape of the cylinder is not prove that the copper cylinder are not conduc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, lastly, look, may, so, for example, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 52.1666666667 29% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1977.66487455 60% => OK
No of words: 231.0 407.700716846 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15151515152 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4776280149 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 212.727598566 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510822510823 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 371.7 618.680645161 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4432191997 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.0 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.5882352941 20.6045352989 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.