When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success." Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.
It is every person's desire to succeed in life and build a prosperous future. In this regard, there has always been the amusing controversy around what is most significant to this dream; luck or hard-work. Although I can't deny the effect chance has had for many prosperous individuals, I believe, in the end, we are all rewarded with what is the result of our own persistence and hard work through life. I will briefly address some points that will corroborate my viewpoint.
Many staunch believers in luck, dismiss all the impact that truely hard work has in life. Thus, they are always waiting for opportunities to appear out of nowhere that will magically provide a prosperous life for them. And when they do not reach the future they dream of, they blame they're bad luck and thus, plunge into a motiveless life habit. For instance, many may go on their life waiting to win the lottery so they can build their desired life, without thriving to do so through work. In this regard, I believe putting all the weight on chance and luck in life, will have adverse impacts on the life styles of people. Whereas when people truly believe prosperity is a result of hard work, they will thrive for their dreams and lead a motivated and healthy life.
A popular belief currently prevailing among many people, is the effect of the law of attraction. Attraction states that if you set your mind to something, and thrive hard to reach that dream, the world will work in your favor and bestow the means of your desire for you. According to this law though, an essential part is that you believe in you dream, and work towards reaching it. I personally have seen many cases when amazing opportunities have appeared for those who truly work with persistence. But never has a great opportunity appeared for someone who is sitting on the couch , shuffling through TV channels, waiting for the bell to ring with a check or an incredible employment opportunity. So, to conclude, I believe life only rewards the tenacious hard workers, not those who are wasting their life in their search for chance.
Needless to say, we have all seen many cases where someone would just lucky in a job, a scientific discovery, etc, and are familiar with the amazing effect chance has. But we must not forget, these lucky incidences happen to those who are already thriving to blossom. Never has a person unveiled an astounding science discovery from the living of his/her house. So, it can be declared that, if chance has an effect, it is only for the hard workers who might chance a break in life.
In conclusion, the dilemma of hard work or luck will always be of interest among people who are scrutinizing the life of wealthy, successful people. But in my opinion, only people who are too lazy to thrive would believe luck alone can turn someone's life around and result in a prosperity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...is dream; luck or hard-work. Although I cant deny the effect chance has had for many...
^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...ch the future they dream of, they blame theyre bad luck and thus, plunge into a motive...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
... a motiveless life habit. For instance, many may go on their life waiting to win the lot...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 584, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... for someone who is sitting on the couch , shuffling through TV channels, waiting ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, if, may, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 502.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71115537849 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48543138801 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478087649402 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0421469446 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.81818181818 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155236568691 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512750313785 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415232107333 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939951737268 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334780803978 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.