altruism passage
Summarize the point made in the lecture making sure explaining how they oppose points made in the passage
Here, the passage and the lecture is about altruism. Passage has stated some positive points of altruists. Whereas, the lecture gives contradicting points. Both the lecture and passage consists their own reasoning for the explanation of points stated.
First, the lecturer has an argument for the meerkat, which is a mammal and one of them works as to guard the other meerkats. Talking about meerkats, the lecturer argues that actually the guardian does the work after having the food so it does not have to be hungry in that case. In addition, the lecturer also told that when any predator attacks then the guard is at the lowest risk than any other meerkat of that group. The reasoning he gave was about the alarm that guard has to make when predator attacks, which is sometimes confusing for the other meerkats.
Second, the point stated int the passage was about human being selflessly donating their own kidney to any of their relatives or an unknown person, an act of altuism. On the contrary, the lecturer argues that the human donating his/her own kidney gets many non-materialistic awards such as appreciation from the society, self worth etc. So by the reasoning provided by the lecturer it does not remain a totally selfless act.
In conlcusion, the reasoning provided by the passage and the lecture are opposite of each other stating the altruism behaviour by animals and humans in a different way. The examples of meerkat as an animal and human for the kidney donation is stated to give reasoning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Here, the passage and the lecture is abo...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ated some positive points of altruists. Whereas, the lecture gives contradicting points...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ltruism behaviour by animals and humans in a different way. The examples of meerkat as an animal a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, if, second, so, then, whereas, as to, in addition, such as, talking about, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89961389961 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48690013107 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525096525097 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7598340596 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6153846154 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159404950682 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737822781711 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634350078715 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115660306709 0.162205337803 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0887821629553 0.0443174109184 200% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.