Apparently, there has been a debate about the possibility of controlling Zebra mussel's population.
Apparently, there has been a debate about the possibility of controlling Zebra mussel's population. A group of scientist holds a believe that there is no way to control Zebra's population, which represented by the author in the reading passage, while another group thinks that was in the past, but now a day there are a lot of approaches to stop this growing in Zebra's population, as the professor explains in the lecture.
First of all, the lecturer claims that it is true the Zebra can spread throughout the world by the ships, however, today the ships can get ride from the water they already used to balance the ship in the ocean instead of fresh water, so the Zebra mussels will die because they can not survive in a salty water. By this point, the professor successfully argues the first opinion of the author.
Second, the lecture asserts that at the beginning there were no predators for the Zebra mussels, the same as the reading material suggests, but with the time the aquatic birds start to feed on the Zebra mussels, and they can eat large amount of them. As long with this fact, the text assumption will be practically not true.
Finally, the professor agree with the author about the Zebra ‘s negative impact on the fish that feed on the plants, on the other hand, the professor maintains an opposite side of view regarding overall fish population, he asserts that the Zebra will provide food for the fish who live in the bottom of the ocean, as they accumulate there, so they have positive impact on another type of fish. That is in turn, negate the third theory in the reading passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Apparently, there has been a debate abou...
^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... population. A group of scientist holds a believe that there is no way to control Zebras ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...opulation. A group of scientist holds a believe that there is no way to control Zebras ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the professor explains in the lecture. First of all, the lecturer claims that i...
^^^^
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'salty water'.
Suggestion: salty water
...ill die because they can not survive in a salty water. By this point, the professor successfu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgues the first opinion of the author. Second, the lecture asserts that at the ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sumption will be practically not true. Finally, the professor agree with the au...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, first, however, regarding, second, so, third, while, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 284.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67253521127 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41115437983 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.30908271 49.2860985944 256% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.875 110.228320801 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.5 21.698381199 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.25 7.06452816374 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293410736754 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161743088408 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.285851054749 0.0662205650399 432% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16888633014 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167916107277 0.0443174109184 379% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.3589403974 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.4 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.