Apparently, there has been a historical debate about the dinosaurs who had been lived in the north slope one hundred years ago, if these dinosaurs migrate during the winter or not?.
Apparently, there has been a historical debate about the dinosaurs who had been lived in the north slope one hundred years ago, if these dinosaurs migrate during the winter or not?. A group of scientists believes that those dinosaurs have to migrate to a warmer region which represented by the reading passage, while another group refutes this idea as the professor does in the lecture, he tries to convince his students with the opposite side of view.
First of all, the professor contends that the sun during the summer in the north slope had been shine for about twenty hours a day, that led to developing a tremendous amount of vegetation in that season, so, the dinosaurs could feeding on this vegetation even if these vegetations had died at winter. So the dinosaurs did not have to migrate to another area, as the author in the reading passage claimed, in addition, there was no need to search for food as it was available, even if no sun was around.
Second, the professor maintains an opposites side of view regarding the meaning of living of these dinosaurs in herds, he adds, living in herds not mean that those dinosaurs had to migrate, that may mention to their way in protecting themselves from predators, then he gives an example of elks, these elks don't migrate to any place but at the same time, they live in herds. By this point, the lecture knocks down the author evidence about the meaning of living in herds.
Finally, the author assumes that all the dinosaurs were capable of moving all that way to another area, the professor claims, that is true for the grown up dinosaurs, then, he asks a question, what about the young dinosaurs?, did they left them behind?, that do not make sense as the professor assume. So, the third suggestion of the reading passage is practically unbelievable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Apparently, there has been a historical ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents with the opposite side of view. First of all, the professor contends tha...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'feed'
Suggestion: feed
...in that season, so, the dinosaurs could feeding on this vegetation even if these vegeta...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... available, even if no sun was around. Second, the professor maintains an oppos...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he gives an example of elks, these elks dont migrate to any place but at the same ti...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... about the meaning of living in herds. Finally, the author assumes that all the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, third, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73734177215 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4993249369 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537974683544 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.0018335288 49.2860985944 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.125 110.228320801 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.5 21.698381199 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.75 7.06452816374 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433064263312 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207272439388 0.0996497079465 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.307223776942 0.0662205650399 464% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25635062482 0.162205337803 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19082966952 0.0443174109184 431% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.3589403974 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 53.8541721854 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.0289183223 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.