The article states that the animals show altruistic behaviours, where an animal sacrifices it's interest for other animals in the group, and states that altruism is the opposite of selfishness, the article comes up with three reasons to support the claim. Whereas the lecturer opposes these by stating that in science new theories refutes the old ones, causing there are frequent changes in the theories.
First, the article says that, Humans, animals and mamals in general are abound of altruism. As humans donate food to stangers, blood and even to that matter organs. However the professor posits that, Humans gain apprehension and gifts for their donations, and challenges the statement saying, if the apprehension would not have been offered then it would be doubtful if anyone would donate the organs or anything for that matter.
Second, the article explains that, animals are found to be willing to sacrifice food, or even their life for the sake of assisting their members. By giving the example of Meerkats, the article claims that, the an individual meerkat acts as a leader and guides the group, without having food,looking out for predators while others hunt for food. But the professor opposes this claim by stating that, the new research has found out a new behaviour in the habbit of Meerkats, the one supporting or leading the group fills the tummy before anyone else.
Third, the article says that, the individual meerkat is at the risk of falling pray to the predators, as after rising the alarm it has to flee alone, which might make it easier for the predator to catch it. Although the Professor explains by saying that, the individual meerkat is the one at benefit, as she says that the new theory reveals the meerkat alarms the other groups which can alert the predator as well, as this individual meerkat is the first to notice the predator, it can escape before anyone else.
The article states that the animals show altruistic behaviors, where an animal sacrifices its interest for other animals in the group, and states that altruism is the opposite of selfishness, the article comes up with three reasons to support the claim. Whereas the lecturer opposes these by stating that in science new theories refutes the old ones, causing there are frequent changes in the theories.
First, the article says that, Humans, animals and mammals in general are abound of altruism. As humans donate food to strangers, blood and even to that matter organs. However, the professor posits that, Humans gain apprehension and gifts for their donations, and challenges the statement saying, if the apprehension would not have been offered then it would be doubtful if anyone would donate the organs or anything for that matter.
Second, the article explains that, animals are found to be willing to sacrifice food, or even their life for the sake of assisting their members. By giving the example of Meerkats, the article claims that, the an individual meerkat acts as a leader and guides the group, without having food,looking out for predators while others hunt for food. But the professor opposes this claim by stating that, the new research has found out a new behavior in the habit of Meerkats, the one supporting or leading the group fills the tummy before anyone else.
Third, the article says that, the individual meerkat is at the risk of falling prey to the predators, as after raising the alarm it has to flee alone, which might make it easier for the predator to catch it. Although the Professor explains by saying that, the individual meerkat is the one at benefit, as she says that the new theory reveals the meerkat alarms the other groups which can alert the predator as well, as this individual meerkat is the first to notice the predator, it can escape before anyone else.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: the; an
...e of Meerkats, the article claims that, the an individual meerkat acts as a leader and...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , looking
...nd guides the group, without having food,looking out for predators while others hunt for...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'well', 'whereas', 'while', 'as to', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252077562327 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.157894736842 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0526315789474 0.0723426182421 73% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0249307479224 0.0435111971325 57% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0277008310249 0.0277247811725 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14404432133 0.128828473217 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0443213296399 0.0370669169778 120% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.40481089878 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0249307479224 0.0208969081088 119% => OK
Particles: 0.00831024930748 0.00154638098197 537% => OK
Determiners: 0.138504155125 0.128158765124 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.016620498615 0.0158828679856 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00831024930748 0.0114777025283 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1907.0 1645.83664459 116% => OK
No of words: 321.0 271.125827815 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94080996885 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.380062305296 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.271028037383 0.287516216867 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.143302180685 0.187439937562 76% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0872274143302 0.113142543107 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40481089878 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529595015576 0.539623497131 98% => OK
Word variations: 55.2383982295 53.8517498576 103% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 32.1 21.7502111507 148% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.963441292 49.3711431718 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 190.7 132.220823453 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1 21.7502111507 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 0.878197800319 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 59.2028037383 50.5018328374 117% => OK
Elegance: 2.09210526316 1.90840788429 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.734378502498 0.549887131256 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.215061697716 0.142949733639 150% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.097130128994 0.0787303798458 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.724204368281 0.631733273073 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151181230375 0.139662658121 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.389188478003 0.266732575781 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.208777177583 0.103435571967 202% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.45429407118 0.414875509568 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0928308814521 0.0530846634433 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.546332042578 0.40443939384 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164299292644 0.0528353158467 311% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.