electronic medical records
The professor discusses three main drawbacks of electronic medical records. The information she presents is in direct contrast to the facts outlined in the reading passage.
First of all, the speaker makes it clear that the costs related to paper records will not decrease noticeably. This is specially true considering the fact that most of the doctors will still take notes and more importantly they will not drop away the papers since they keep them as backup information. However, the reading explains that a good amount of money can be saved by using electronic medical records. In fact, the costs related to papers will decrease.
Second, the lecturer points out that the errors which are related to inaccurate handwriting would still exists due to the fact that most of doctors will take notes while examining patients. In addition, the professor notes that staffs are in charge of entering the data of patients to the computer. Therefore, handwriting mistakes could not be completely avoided. On the other hand, the reading describes that electronic medical records utilize standardized formats and fonts to prevent errors related wrong input data.
Third, the speaker specifies that according to the legal laws for keeping the patients information a secret, it is not always easy to have access to these electronic medical records. However, the reading states that these electronic records have a great role in medical researches due to availability and accessibility of these electronic records.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'exist'
Suggestion: exist
...d to inaccurate handwriting would still exists due to the fact that most of doctors wi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the doctors') or simply say ''most doctors''.
Suggestion: most of the doctors; most doctors
...would still exists due to the fact that most of doctors will take notes while examining patient...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...rding to the legal laws for keeping the patients information a secret, it is not always ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, third, while, in addition, in fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3125 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6913925299 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545833333333 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7495636978 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327464367586 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119800419729 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13770031693 0.0662205650399 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205744484721 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855203861314 0.0443174109184 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.