European coin

Essay topics:

European coin

According to the reading, the discovered silver coin in the state of Main is a fake object and does not belonged to European travelers called the Norse; however, the lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the reading.
First, the reading states that the coin has been found far away from the Norse site; therefore, it cannot be attributed to them. On the contrary, the lecturer states that native North Americans used to travel a lot, so it is possible that they brought the coin and other objects (which has been found at far locations) to far regions.
Secondly, the reading asserts that no other coins have been discovered in Norse site. In contrast, the lecturer notes that the Norse did not choose the site as their permanent residence. In fact, they returned to Europe, so they must had packed their stuff including all their silver coins when they started their journey back to Europe.
Finally, the reading contends that unlike Europeans, native North Americans did not recognize the coins as money. The lecturer refutes this argument by explaining that although native North Americans were not familiar with the concept of money, they might trade things in exchange for objects which are aesthetically appealing like these silver coins.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'belong'
Suggestion: belong
...e of Main is a fake object and does not belonged to European travelers called the Norse;...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.995215311 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35854593941 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588516746411 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.573201986 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06452816374 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207620210011 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891642042629 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648863170182 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121000715235 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550025719273 0.0443174109184 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.