integrated writing TPO14
In contrast to the reading passage, which emphasizes that salvage logging has plenty of merits both for a damaged forest and for the economy climate; the professor focuses on the opposite view. The professor in the lecture conflicts with the author's opinions on the reading and states that salvage logging has serious long-term damages.
The passage states that after a huge fire, dead trees should remove from the forest because they will take a long time to decompose and this does not allow growing and recovering new trees in the forest. However, the lecturer explains that cleaning up is not necessary because these dead trees, which have damaged by the natural process can provide beneficial and effective nutrients to generate new trees.
Moreover, in the text, the author mentions that dead trees are converted to a suitable place for insects like spruce bark beetle, which can damage to spruce trees. However, the professor rebuts this by saying that these insects can use for birds and other insects and they are a part of the cycle of life in the forest and are important for trees.
Finally, the author claims that salvage logging brings economic advantages and plenty of industries can use the wood from these damaged trees. In addition, the salvage logging can provide golden job opportunities for people. While the professor believes that, these damaged trees can recover by using helicopters or other vehicles instead of a lot of expensive methods. Furthermore, she states that jobs created by the salvage logging are temporary and are not god situation for workers.
To sum up, the professor effectively challenges the claims made in the article.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12408759124 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45177255514 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518248175182 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2921753895 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.636363636 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489030540644 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178593549714 0.0996497079465 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735037770967 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237668559628 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116225642945 0.0443174109184 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.