Recently, there has been a debate about the fine structure which had been found surrounding the skeleton of sinosauropterys, a group of scientists, a professor as well, suggest these lines are feathers, while another group which represented by the author refutes this idea and gives many critics points.
First of all, the professor argues the reading passage assertion, about the possibility of the formation of the lines after the dinosaur death, he thinks it is unlikely to be believable, because other animals functional structure had been well preserved by volcanic ash, besides that, there is no sign of decomposition on any animal fossil, as well as, other animals, the dinosaur fossil suppose to be kept in the same excellent way.
Second, the professor contends that there is a chemical difference between the feather and the frill, the feathers contain a beta carotin protein, while the frills do not include this kind of protein. So, by this point, the professor makes a grave doubt about the author idea that the presence of this lines is because of frill, not feather.
Finally, the professor claims that the feather may not use for flying or keeping the body temperature high, as the reading passage assumes, it may have other jobs, for example of a kind of bird use his tail's feather in displaying activities, in addition, some approach suggest that the dinosaur feather was colorful, it were orange and white , that support the idea of using them in attacking mate. By this argument, the reading passage point, about the unusefulness of this feather, being practically untrue.
In sum, the professor explains why he doesn't trust any of the author critics and, indeed, gives a convenience argument to each critic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: SUPPOSE_TO[1]
Message: Probably you should use a past participle here: 'supposed'.
Suggestion: supposed
... as, other animals, the dinosaur fossil suppose to be kept in the same excellent way. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to be kept in the same excellent way. Second, the professor contends that ther...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ut the author idea that the presence of this lines is because of frill, not feather....
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ines is because of frill, not feather. Finally, the professor claims that the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Finally, the professor claims that the feather may not use for flying or ke...
^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tails feather in displaying activities, in addition, some approach suggest that ...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r was colorful, it were orange and white , that support the idea of using them in ...
^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., that support the idea of using them in attacking mate. By this argument, the re...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his feather, being practically untrue. In sum, the professor explains why he do...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... In sum, the professor explains why he doesnt trust any of the author critics and, in...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, if, may, second, so, well, while, for example, in addition, kind of, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 238.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59408152176 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596638655462 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 21.2450331126 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.910486805 49.2860985944 266% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 198.333333333 110.228320801 180% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.6666666667 21.698381199 183% => OK
Discourse Markers: 19.6666666667 7.06452816374 278% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113796002282 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549484037362 0.0996497079465 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347900534741 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650550146313 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326712978542 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 13.3589403974 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.35 53.8541721854 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.0289183223 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 10.7273730684 256% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.498013245 168% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.2008830022 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.