Recently, there has been a historical debate about the usage of a vessel that had been discovered in Iraq,
as a batterie. A group of archeologists holds the believe that this vessel may have another usage, and the ancient Iraqi people never used it as a batterie, who represented by the author in the reading passage, while another group asserts that this vessel for sure had been used to generate electricity, and the professor support this idea in the reading passage.
First of all, the lecturer contends that the absence of wires connected to the vessel, is not an evidence of not using the vessel as a batterie, he adds, the person who discover this vessel was not a professional, he was just a local people, as long with this fact, this person might already found wires in the same place , but he did n't realize the importance of them, so may he dispose them. By this point, the professor refutes the first opinion has been made by the text.
Second, the lecture claims that the vessel might be used at the beginning to keep scrolls, then one of the ancient inventers discover that this can produce electricity if it combined with iron and liquid. So the lecture casts the doubt about the reading passage assumption of usage of this vessel just for keeping scrolls.
Finally, regarding the question that has been made by the author, why the ancient Iraqi's people need to generate the electricity?, they didn't have any device powered by it, that may be true as the professor says, but, on the other hand, the ancient people might use this electrical power to heal some pain, like the usage of mild electricity today in some medical field. As the lecture gives other use of electricity, that makes the author question no longer important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
as a batterie. A group of archeologists ho...
^^^
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
as a batterie. A group of archeologists ho...
^^
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...atterie. A group of archeologists holds the believe that this vessel may have another usage...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...rie. A group of archeologists holds the believe that this vessel may have another usage...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...port this idea in the reading passage. First of all, the lecturer contends that...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 327, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ht already found wires in the same place , but he did nt realize the importance of...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rst opinion has been made by the text. Second, the lecture claims that the vess...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this vessel just for keeping scrolls. Finally, regarding the question that has...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 144, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...need to generate the electricity?, they didnt have any device powered by it, that may...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70731707317 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45066827227 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529616724739 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.116997792494 1709% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 138.762780943 49.2860985944 282% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.875 110.228320801 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.875 21.698381199 165% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.125 7.06452816374 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150969603129 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652904870421 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434278493731 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924832802056 0.162205337803 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233282870993 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.3589403974 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.63 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.