Summarize the point made in the lecture .

Essay topics:

Summarize the point made in the lecture .

Communal Online Encyclopedias

According to the lecture, the professor refutes all the points which are mentioned in the passage ,about communal online encyclopedias.She provides all the necessary information to refuse the points related to the online encyclopedias.

Firstly , the reading passage argue that , the online encyclopedias are not written by the expert so that they are not follow academic standard .The professor says that, if the tradition encyclopedias contain any errors then it will go many decay. There is no modification possible instanly still new addtion of encyclopedias in market.This is not happened with online encyclopedias.

Secondly,the passage talk about the malious attacks on online encyclopedias. That they change the original contains and delete the information by hacker. So they are not correct. This not the case according to the professor because online encyclopedias provided with securities. They are only in read format .So no one can chage it without authorized permission. The second fact is that there are the advance editorial which kept the eye on malious data. So this is not true that, online encyclopedias is not correct.

The last thing is that the ,passage mentioned that the online encyclopedias provide lots of unnecessary information so that school students get confued. It totally refute by professor saying that this is main advantage of online encyclopedias that they have huge space to provide more and important infomation in spectacular ways which is not possible with traditional one. They have limit of space.

So finally the professor contradict all the points mentioned in the passage.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: Firstly , the reading passage argue that ,
Description: The fragment passage argue that is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace argue with verb, past tense

Sentence: The second fact is that there are the advance editorial which kept the eye on malious data.
Description: The fragment the advance editorial is not usually preceded by are
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace are with is

Sentence: It totally refute by professor saying that
Sentence: It is totally refuted by professor saying that

Sentence: So finally the professor contradict all the points mentioned in the passage.
Description: The fragment professor contradict all is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace contradict with verb, past tense

Sentence: There is no modification possible instanly still new addtion of encyclopedias in market.This is not happened with online encyclopedias.
Error: addtion Suggestion: addition
Error: instanly Suggestion: instantly

Sentence: Secondly,the passage talk about the malious attacks on online encyclopedias.
Error: malious Suggestion: No alternate word

Sentence: They are only in read format .So no one can chage it without authorized permission.
Error: chage Suggestion: No alternate word

Sentence: The second fact is that there are the advance editorial which kept the eye on malious data.
Error: malious Suggestion: No alternate word

Sentence: The last thing is that the ,passage mentioned that the online encyclopedias provide lots of unnecessary information so that school students get confued.
Error: confued Suggestion: confused

Sentence: It totally refute by professor saying that this is main advantage of online encyclopedias that they have huge space to provide more and important infomation in spectacular ways which is not possible with traditional one.
Error: infomation Suggestion: information

flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 20 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 15 12
No. of Words: 258 250
No. of Characters: 1362 1200
No. of Different Words: 132 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.008 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.279 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.956 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 79 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.2 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.077 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.377 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.613 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.083 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4