Summarize the points with the core curricula discussed in the lecture, and then explain the advantages to fixing these problems using points from the reading.
The article here introduces with the core curricula developed by American colleges to develop skills like communication, reasoning, and more skills. The professor in lecture mentions the discussion and points made by the review board and a team of students. The points made were the problems or flaws in this core curriculum which needs to be addressed.
First, the professor mentions about some subjects or courses which are too easy or are irrelevant for that particular field. With fixing this problem by adding subjects related to their major or interest, the students of the particular field would find it more beneficial.
Second, the professor stated the problem of big classes. There are more student for a particular class and overcrowding in a class needs to be solved first in terms of priority. The point made in above paragraph i.e. dividing the courses as per their field would directly solve the problem of overcrowding in a particular class.
Third, the professor says about the writing extensive subjects. This subjects can be divided across the curricula as these core curricula subjects take the space of only one-third of the undergraduate program and thus won't be a burden on students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he review board and a team of students. The points made were the problems or flaws ...
^^^
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'students'?
Suggestion: students
... problem of big classes. There are more student for a particular class and overcrowding...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, third, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 197.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17258883249 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76448024067 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0898936727 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06452816374 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182055378722 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070308873697 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525440556296 0.0662205650399 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106308436351 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600956075487 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.