Both lecturer and passage about the communal online encyclopedia. The lecturer oppose the problems described in the passages.
To begin with, the lecturer mentions that error in the online encyclopedia is common and no one can find perfect and real comphrehand details. Online encyclopedia help to easily find the factual data. The lecturer oppose the specific point made by reading passage that lack of academic credentials contributors provides the inaccurate details in the online encyclopedias.
Furthermore, the lecturer explains that online encyclopedias recognize the protection from the criminal facts. Original formats no one can change the information's. Its provides the information's are more reliable and eliminate corrupt data. The lecturer refutes the problem state in the reading passage that online encyclopedias provides corrupted and editing details,
Moreover, the lecturer claims that communal online encyclopedias has less spaces but issue not arise to lack of spaces. The information's provides are more valuable and greater diversity. The most beneficial with greatest diversity. The lecturer contradict the problem illustrates the reading passage that communal encyclopedias attentions to negligible topics which creates negative influence of the important data.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...munal online encyclopedia. The lecturer oppose the problems described in the passages....
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 214, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
...ily find the factual data. The lecturer oppose the specific point made by reading pass...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 70, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun spaces is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... that communal online encyclopedias has less spaces but issue not arise to lack of s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'provide'.
Suggestion: provide
...ise to lack of spaces. The informations provides are more valuable and greater diversity...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...re more valuable and greater diversity. The most beneficial with greatest diversity...
^^^
Line 4, column 208, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the greatest'.
Suggestion: with the greatest
... greater diversity. The most beneficial with greatest diversity. The lecturer contradict the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ost beneficial with greatest diversity. The lecturer contradict the problem illustr...
^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'contradicts'.
Suggestion: contradicts
...l with greatest diversity. The lecturer contradict the problem illustrates the reading pas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 22.412803532 31% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 184.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0 5.08290768461 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03046519229 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 145.348785872 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.55342163355 122% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.6584103604 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238908936851 0.272083759551 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966051599752 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100866099399 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172382165323 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231264779011 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 53.8541721854 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.93 12.2367328918 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.