The lecture utterly refutes the various posits given against Chevalier de seingalt in the reading. First of all the professor believes that no memoir can be totally correct in describing the past events, word by word. She feels Chevalier was true in his descriptions. She opposes the three arguments given against him in following points.
Chevalier was a poor guy but he portrayed himself rich: Professor gives her view that chevalier borrowed money from merchants but that does not proves him poor. He was a wealthy guy but was also fond of spending money in parties and gambling. So when he ran...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Votes
Essay Categories
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 27 in 30
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 269 250
No. of Characters: 1302 1200
No. of Different Words: 161 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.05 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.84 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.518 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 71 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.417 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.243 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.583 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.358 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.606 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.203 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4