TPO 01 integrated writing
The reading states that decreasing working days of an employee would be something beneficial for companies and offer three reasons of support. However, the speaker refutes the author's explanation and he adds that four working days policy is not effective in a way reading said and offer three counter claims.
First, the reading points out that the decrease in the number of days will increase the number of jobs and this will be helpful for unemployment. The lecturer, however, takes this view that decreasing working days to four days will increase company's cost, since hiring more employee will increase the cost of training and medical issues; in addition, company's needs to provide more space for the new employee they hire, consequently this will need more budget.
Second, the article brings up this view that decreasing working days increase company's profit, since employees will have less error and also will be more alert. In contrast, the professor disputes this point due to the fact that four working days is equal to five days and no additional benefit it will be present.
Third, the passage sheds light on this point that this decrease will improve employee's life. The lecturer casts doubt on this point due to the fact that increase in the amount of free time will increase the risk that employee lose their job and this will decrease the quality of their life. He mentions that if the economy is not in good shape, employees with four working days are more likely to lose their job, because companies have less interest on them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...pport. However, the speaker refutes the authors explanation and he adds that four worki...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...planation and he adds that four working days policy is not effective in a way readin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, third, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93893129771 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28921103245 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484732824427 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1335883135 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.777777778 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1111111111 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413172695871 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.194732850553 0.0996497079465 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842568589426 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271764453613 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01019149669 0.0443174109184 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.0289183223 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.