The passage states that, providing an option to work four-day week instead of a regular five-day week for less pay would benefit the employees and economy as a whole for three reasons. However, the professor explains that it won't have the desired effect as described by the author and refutes each of the points provided by the author.
First, the reading states that giving the option to work four-day workweek will help companies by making the employees well rested, satisfied and less prone to error without incurring any extra expenditure. However, the professor explains that the companies will be paying more in that case. According to the professor, companies will need to hire more employees. They will need to expend more in training and medical benefits for them. Also, more office space and computers will be needed for the extra employees. As a result, the overall costs will increase because of the policy.
Second, the article claims that the policy will help to solve the unemployment problem as for every four employees who avail this opportunity a new job will be created. The professor refutes the claim by saying that, the companies might ask the existing employees to do overtime to make up. He states that companies might also raise expectations. The employees might be asked to do the same amount of work in four days instead of five days. In that case, the current jobs will become unpleasant.
Third, the reading posits that the policy will improve the life of employees by providing extra time to indulge in personal and family life. But the professor explains that it has some risks of reducing the quality of life of the employees. The employees with four-day weeks will have decreased job stability as they will be the first to loose job in case of lay offs. In addition, they might be passed over for promotion because the management will look to have employees working five days for continuous operation and supervision.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... stability as they will be the first to loose job in case of lay offs. In addition, t...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'well', 'as for', 'in addition', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241666666667 0.261695866417 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.169444444444 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0611111111111 0.0723426182421 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0305555555556 0.0435111971325 70% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0194444444444 0.0277247811725 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133333333333 0.128828473217 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0527777777778 0.0370669169778 142% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49417319129 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0361111111111 0.0208969081088 173% => OK
Particles: 0.00277777777778 0.00154638098197 180% => OK
Determiners: 0.130555555556 0.128158765124 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.05 0.0158828679856 315% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00555555555556 0.0114777025283 48% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1956.0 1645.83664459 119% => OK
No of words: 330.0 271.125827815 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92727272727 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.04852973271 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345454545455 0.374372842146 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269696969697 0.287516216867 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184848484848 0.187439937562 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.124242424242 0.113142543107 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49417319129 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49696969697 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.9398152396 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.4117647059 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.46701401 49.3711431718 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.058823529 132.220823453 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 21.7502111507 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.764705882353 0.878197800319 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 46.3814616756 50.5018328374 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.94936708861 1.90840788429 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.644831159147 0.549887131256 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.157530368381 0.142949733639 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0723139402309 0.0787303798458 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.582284380502 0.631733273073 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.132231662134 0.139662658121 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.297705443853 0.266732575781 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1136614755 0.103435571967 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.541717736818 0.414875509568 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0714543956658 0.0530846634433 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.509389639843 0.40443939384 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240386365587 0.0528353158467 45% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 3.1766004415 220% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 10.2958057395 165% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.