The author explains how the short workweek can be of advantage to the company and also the employer. In contrast to this, the speaker explains the disadvantages of short workweek for the company as well as the employees who opt for four days work a week.
The author explains his view that employers who insist on working four day a week and accept 80% of their pay have many benefits like employment rate increases and payroll does not increase as people are hired at a rate of 1:4. i.e., for every 4 employees working for 4 days a week with 80% of salary, 1 new person is employed for 80% salary because of which employment rate is increased, costly errors are reduced, lower salary and increased free time improves quality of life of an employer.
The speaker has opposite point of view. He asserts saying that though it is a fringe benefit for the employee, it is a loss for company. He describes the possible disadvantages of short work week. Firstly, if a new person is employed, it forces the companies to spend more on his training, medical and health facilities. And it doesn't make a difference on number of days he work. In addition to this, more office space and computers are required and also hiring is costly. An alternate solution to this is overtime work can be performed so that in 4 days, 5 day work is completed. But the disadvantages would be worse as it decreases the jobs ability.
Moreover, employers who opt for short workweek are at a high risk of loosing jobs during recession, promotion to management level will be reduced as continuous coverage and consistent supervision for the whole week is needed at that level in most of the times.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
..., medical and health facilities. And it doesnt make a difference on number of days he ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 639, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'jobs'' or 'job's'?
Suggestion: jobs'; job's
...ages would be worse as it decreases the jobs ability. Moreover, employers who op...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 296.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65540540541 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65600708402 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533783783784 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9634485133 49.2860985944 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433845111096 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129805877179 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0970660623129 0.0662205650399 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240864791659 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844946756406 0.0443174109184 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.