The lecturer describes a company which has recently tackled its projects in team approach with unsatisfactory results, which completely contradicts with what claimed in the article.
First, in team approach some people get free rides. Though the article suggests a team member having participated in the decision making process will enjoy his work further down the line whereas the professor suggests not everybody will take the responsibility to put his best in the project rather enjoy the team success being just a member. In such a project high achievers' contributions left without proper acknowledgement, which becomes frustrating for them sometimes.
Secondly, the article states that, with greater number of people, their skill set and reach to resources will make a project complete faster, which, on the contrary, is not the picture in real. As the professor says when people works in groups far more time is required for number of meetings to reach a consensus, which could have been quickly reached while working alone.
Finally the author claims in a group where responsibilities are distributed over all the team members, as a whole the group can take more risk which in turn favors creative ideas. On the other hand the speaker opposes this idea stating influential people in a group can take over the control of ideas and can put down any creative idea from other team members. here he further exemplifies that when this kind of decisions, made by influential people, goes wrong the blame goes to the whole team and everybody takes the responcibility of the losses may occur to the company.
To conclude, though the article presents better aspects of group approach for completing a project the lecture refutes all of its claims with justified reasoning and proper examples.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...uickly reached while working alone. Finally the author claims in a group where resp...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 362, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Here
... creative idea from other team members. here he further exemplifies that when this k...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'kind of', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268987341772 0.261695866417 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.155063291139 0.158904122519 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0791139240506 0.0723426182421 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0474683544304 0.0435111971325 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0221518987342 0.0277247811725 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123417721519 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0474683544304 0.0370669169778 128% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74488384357 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0189873417722 0.0208969081088 91% => OK
Particles: 0.00632911392405 0.00154638098197 409% => OK
Determiners: 0.129746835443 0.128158765124 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0253164556962 0.0158828679856 159% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0316455696203 0.0114777025283 276% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1801.0 1645.83664459 109% => OK
No of words: 292.0 271.125827815 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.16780821918 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.380136986301 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291095890411 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174657534247 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106164383562 0.113142543107 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74488384357 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585616438356 0.539623497131 109% => OK
Word variations: 63.0202535965 53.8517498576 117% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 29.2 21.7502111507 134% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9950875076 49.3711431718 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.1 132.220823453 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2 21.7502111507 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 0.878197800319 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 58.3095890411 50.5018328374 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.95774647887 1.90840788429 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.564995026155 0.549887131256 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.141527520837 0.142949733639 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0896910578024 0.0787303798458 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.703877194117 0.631733273073 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.227632438588 0.139662658121 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.25751334272 0.266732575781 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102961284508 0.103435571967 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.293844932757 0.414875509568 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0191940397073 0.0530846634433 36% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33667603222 0.40443939384 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10019704312 0.0528353158467 190% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.