The author states that establishing a group of people working on a same project has some advantages compared conducting the project individually. However, the professor contradicts with this perspective by presenting the company's outcome after 6 months.
First of all, not all of the members in the group contributes to the project equally and even some individuals take free rides. Regarding the benefits that the author mentions which individual can shine in the group activity, the professor mentions that all the positive feedback and benefits will count on the whole group rather than every member of the group.
In addition, the professor says that the results show that the project has not progressed quickly in contradict to what the text states. In the group activity, there are a lot of meetings and reaching to consensus is hard. Even, some individuals dropped of the project as they were very influential.
Finally, some creative ideas were not taken into account according to the outcome revealed 6 months later. Professor states that some members ignore the novel and creative ideas of others which leads to the failure of the project. This also leads that project has not gone forward. Consequently, the blame of this fail was on all members of the group and individuals were held responsible for this failure. This contradicts to what the author mentions that in these circumstances no single individual are held accountable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...me after 6 months. First of all, not all of the members in the group contributes to the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of the group and individuals were held responsible for this failure. This contr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, however, regarding, so, even so, in addition, first of all, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2094017094 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77177853149 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521367521368 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.984493328 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.583333333 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06452816374 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26702892892 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970031238589 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594523591108 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159871712351 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564494326198 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.