The article states that having a team og people work on a project offers several advantages and provides three reasons of support. Conversely, the professor states that based on study for certain company that examine the performance of a team work on a project for 6 months, there is no contribution by having a group of people work on a project. And he refutes eaches of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading claims that a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any individual is likely to possess. The professor refutes this point by saying that wotking in a team would not recognize the real contributor to a project. When a project success, the whole team would be recognize and not by member names. Even though they were not being a part of the project sucess.
Second, the article avers that a group can work more quickly to the task assgnied and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems. Also, working in a group can ve very rewarding for members of the team.However, the professor opposes this point by stating that a group would not work quickly as the author suggested. But, a group of people would take so long time, several meeting to reach a consensus regarding agreement to do a task. Meantime, the professor adds that a one person or 2 could be very influential among the group. Or when a group is being influenced by some members, they igorned any warning from other members that seems reasonable.And consequently, when those people diagree upon a work to do, this work dropped immediately. On the other hand, when a project fails, the whole group would be blamed and not a certain individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d be recognize and not by member names. Even though they were not being a part of the proje...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... very rewarding for members of the team.However, the professor opposes this point by st...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he professor adds that a one person or 2 could be very influential among the grou...
^^
Line 5, column 662, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...rom other members that seems reasonable.And consequently, when those people diagree...
^^^
Line 5, column 781, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d immediately. On the other hand, when a project fails, the whole group would be ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, however, regarding, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76975945017 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71026638259 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.116997792494 2564% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0746188764 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.769230769 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.448088229253 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155133444534 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809734882554 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297084393047 0.162205337803 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419185961268 0.0443174109184 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.