The reading passage and listening lecture are discuss about group project advantage and dis advantage. While the reading state that when a team of people involve in a group project that is more beneficial for company. It help to take risky decision that individual can not take. However, the listening refute this point by saying that group project not always doing in a right way sometime it hamper full project and sometime some people are remain unproductive.
First of all, the reading claims that when a group of people work together they can share knowledge ,expertise and skills. That's why group can work more quickly and taking risk to do that in short time and those group member doing there work actively they get recognizes. However, the listening refute this point by saying that sometime some people are not doing there work properly that not hamper the project because some people work very hard but they don't have any recognition.
Secondly, the reading argue that sometime group member can take risky decision by discussion and sometime individual influence can imposes to other people to do work. the lecture counters this point by stating group can not take decision they have only doing meting and sometime 1-2 influential person hamper the work.
Finally, the the author state that group project is a creative work when some one told this idea is great and it will be successful. the lecture refute this point by saying that individual creativity damage the quality of other group member. That's why group project are failed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...that is more beneficial for company. It help to take risky decision that individual ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ing that group project not always doing in a right way sometime it hamper full project and som...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'hampers'?
Suggestion: hampers
...always doing in a right way sometime it hamper full project and sometime some people a...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 443, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...ll project and sometime some people are remain unproductive. First of all, the rea...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e work together they can share knowledge ,expertise and skills. Thats why group c...
^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther they can share knowledge ,expertise and skills. Thats why group can work mor...
^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...share knowledge ,expertise and skills. Thats why group can work more quickly and tak...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...use some people work very hard but they dont have any recognition. Secondl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ard but they dont have any recognition. Secondly, the reading argue that someti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'impose'
Suggestion: impose
...n and sometime individual influence can imposes to other people to do work. the lecture...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...can imposes to other people to do work. the lecture counters this point by stating ...
^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ial person hamper the work. Finally, the the author state that group project is a cr...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ial person hamper the work. Finally, the the author state that group project is a cr...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...t group project is a creative work when some one told this idea is great and it will be ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...dea is great and it will be successful. the lecture refute this point by saying tha...
^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'refutes'.
Suggestion: refutes
... and it will be successful. the lecture refute this point by saying that individual cr...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...mage the quality of other group member. Thats why group project are failed.
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r. Thats why group project are failed.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, while, in short, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 259.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01544401544 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29608027203 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451737451737 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.030944305 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 4.19205298013 429% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416529014676 0.272083759551 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177759638111 0.0996497079465 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615561006658 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281345965909 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492424713408 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 63.6247240618 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.