The given passage discusses the advantages of approaching a new project in the organizations as a team of people. The lecture, on the other hand, completely refutes this opinion.
According to the passage, the project can be finished quickly if the project is assigned to a team of people rather than an individual person. Teamwork provides the benefit of utilizing the knowledge, expertise, and skills of different people to finish the task. The lecture, however, disapproves this view since the teamwork requires more time for the project to move on as it requires the agreement by all of its members.
Also, as per the passage, teamwork allows members to take risks for the project because the team is aware of the fact, for any wrong decision whole team will be accountable rather than a single person. On the other hand, the lecture opposes the teamwork, due to the fact, that for any achievements of the project, the whole team is given credit. This leads to hard working individuals being not recognized for their contribution to the team individually over the members who were just part of the team but actually didn't participate actively in the project.
Lastly, the given passage describes that teamwork is advantageous to influential people since other people are assigned work according to them. The lecture states that control of the team by influential people might lead to other members voice being ignored. This can often lead to the projects to move in a disadvantageous direction despite the fact that few members who are not supportive of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...were just part of the team but actually didnt participate actively in the project. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, lastly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01915708812 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77151096496 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0852004288 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.090909091 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356756875372 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136673866822 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946152107284 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201989836921 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919505424335 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.