The lecturer claims that the painting belongs to Rembrandt, the wellknown painter of the seventeenth century. A controversial statement begins with the reading section that it does not classified as his piece of art. Hence, It explores as whole for three different reason.
First, the reading states that the way woman is customed , has some controversary to other of his painting. The speaker refutes the contend by saying that it repaints after a century. The reason is mentioned for increasing the value of portrayed.
Second, the article which implies that light and shadow do not provide correct refelct. The narrative rebutes the statament made in the reading that contour is sensible. The woman wore the simple light blue dress.
Third, She points out that the canvas has same wood panel which Rembrandt illustrates his self protrait with the hat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'classify'
Suggestion: classify
...th the reading section that it does not classified as his piece of art. Hence, It explores...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng states that the way woman is customed , has some controversary to other of his ...
^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er of his painting. The speaker refutes the contend by saying that it repaints after a cent...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, so, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 30.3222958057 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 724.0 1373.03311258 53% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 139.0 270.72406181 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20863309353 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 4.04702891845 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60901107232 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 145.348785872 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.676258992806 0.540411800872 125% => OK
syllable_count: 204.3 419.366225166 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.1487059695 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.4 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06452816374 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209925954303 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633236015735 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616071324074 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108253590089 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04578584766 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 63.6247240618 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 40.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 12.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.