The reading passage and the lecture are talking about a specific Rembrandt's painting of a woman, and whether or not attributed it to the famous Dutch painter. The article states that it is a fake paint while the lecture explains how a real Rembrandt painting is hiding in this piece of art.
First, the lecturer explains how a new painting was made over the original one with the goal of increase its value, at that moment, with more vibrant colours. A later research of the painting showed that the original painting was hidden under the first layer with more subtle colours and not mistakes in the combination of lights and shadows.
Second, the cambas made of pieces of wood is actually an addition around the original single good piece of panel.
This addition was most probably done to create a bigger piece that, again, could increase its value at that moment.
Finally, the lecturer refers to the linen cap that the woman is wearing in the portrait that was inconsistent with the rest of the clothes. According to the lecturer, the original painting shows Rembrandt selportait with actually a hat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...fic Rembrandts painting of a woman, and whether or not attributed it to the famous Dutch paint...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'later research'.
Suggestion: Later research
...that moment, with more vibrant colours. A later research of the painting showed that the origina...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, if, second, while, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 1373.03311258 67% => OK
No of words: 190.0 270.72406181 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86842105263 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 4.04702891845 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41377051284 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 145.348785872 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557894736842 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 419.366225166 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8744185984 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.625 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364255498455 0.272083759551 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163722554011 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649683121428 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185230547018 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091902380703 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.