The given passage and the lecture here discusses one of the controversial paintings of famous Dutch painter Rembrandt. The passage here describes the points which concluded that the painting in question was not Rembrandt's work. On the other hand, the given lecture gives the reason to believe that the concerned painting belongs to Rembrandt.
According to the passage, the painting has grave inconsistency in terms of the clothing. The lady in the painting is wearing an ordinary hat, which is typical of the servants. At the same time, luxurious fur collar in the painting symbolizes the lady to be wealthy. The lecture opposes this fact, stating that the x-rays of painting clearly shows that fur collar in the painting was made after 100 years of the original painting to increase its value.
Also, according to the passage, the face of the painting is not well illuminated. The fur collar is creating a partial shadow on the face of the lady in the painting although it is well illuminated from below. Since Rembrandt is famous for the perfect representation of lights and shades, so this painting is not his work. The lecturer, however, disapproves this, by stating that the lady in the painting originally had a well illuminated face by a light colored collar.
Lastly, the passage here states that the painting is on a panel of several pieces of wood glued together, which is not typical of Rembrandt's paintings. The lecture, on the other hand, explains that the original painting is enlarged to increase its market value and make it look grand. Also, the wood used for the painting is same as of Rembrandt's other paintings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, lastly, look, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 276.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95652173913 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67675902116 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45652173913 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8680772869 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7142857143 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51198702497 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203619234787 0.0996497079465 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621634389565 0.0662205650399 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322817057063 0.162205337803 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216898173659 0.0443174109184 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.