The topic is whether the portrait of the woman is actually painted by Rembrandt. The reading passage states three reasons that the painting isn't a work of Rembrandt. However, the lecture refutes this opinion.
First, the reading passage shows the inconsistency between the white linen cap and luxurious fur collar that the woman is wearing. Rembrandt who paid a lot of attention to the details of his painting would not make mistake like this. On the contrary, the lecture illustrates that the fur color isn't the part of the original painting. It was added 100 years after the painting was done to make the painting look more valuable. The original color of the fur is simple, aligned with the cap.
Second, the reading passage demonstrates that the light and shadow in the painting don't fit each other as the face is illuminated by the light reflected by the collar where there is the dark fur collar which would absorb the light. The lecture debates that when the painting added by someone else is removed, the original collar is bright light color which can reflect the light.
Third, in the reading passage, the panel is made of several pieces of wood glued together, which never showed in other Rembrandt's works. The lecture indicates that the panel was enlarged when the color of the collar was added to make the paining more grand and valuable. The original panel is made of single piece of wood, just like what Rembrandt would use on his work. Besides, the original wood came from the same tree where some panels of Rembrandt works also came from.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 12
No. of Words: 273 250
No. of Characters: 1259 1200
No. of Different Words: 127 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.065 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.612 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.223 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 78 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 63 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 33 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.89 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.372 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.581 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.063 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... states three reasons that the painting isnt a work of Rembrandt. However, the lectu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... lecture illustrates that the fur color isnt the part of the original painting. It w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e fur is simple, aligned with the cap. Second, the reading passage demonstrates...
^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...at the light and shadow in the painting dont fit each other as the face is illuminat...
^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d in other Rembrandts works. The lecture indicates that the panel was enlarged wh...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, first, however, look, second, so, third, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8037037037 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27088991699 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496296296296 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8592949681 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6428571429 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449469020065 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159148470899 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988369216885 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279174286942 0.162205337803 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033398351291 0.0443174109184 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.