The article states that the dinosaurs were endotherms and provide three reasons of support. However, the lecture expalin that the dinosaurs were not endotherms and refutes each of the author's reason.
First, the reading claims that the fossils of dinosaurs were found in polar region, indicating that the animals were able to maintain their temperature in cold climate. The author refutes this point saying that the period were warmer when a dinosaur lived in polar region. In additional, She states that they migrated or hibernated to warmer region during winter season.
Second, the article posits that position of legs beneath the body supports the endothermic character of dinosaur. The professors, however, says that the position of legs of dinosaur it to support their titanic body rather than to help in running, like a warm blooded animals.
Third, the reading claims that present of haversian canal signify dinosaurs as endothermic creature. The professor opposes that point by saying the present of growth rings. We also learned that presence of growth rings present the development of body higher in warm temperature and slower in cold temperature and unlike warm blooded animals, it is most significant feature of cold blooded animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'animal'?
Suggestion: animal
...to help in running, like a warm blooded animals. Third, the reading claims that pres...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, third, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34848484848 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54513886931 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9960225475 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.9 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375894664111 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154037636745 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864148374715 0.0662205650399 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222030548016 0.162205337803 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384886129866 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.