The author states that dinosaurs were endotherms, like humans who can keep their temperature in warm and cold weather conditions. However, professor rebuts this opinion, by representing three reasons as follows.
First of all, polar regions in the times of the existence of dinosaurs were not as much as cold like now. The polar regions were warmer than today and it was not required for dinosaurs to be endotherms to survive in these regions. Even in some parts where were colder, dinosaurs could migrate to the warmer region or they can be hydrated like modern lizards.
In addition, dinosaurs need legs under their body for their fast growth and the position of legs do not necessarily mean that they were endotherms. Whereas, the author mentions that because dinosaurs did not have side legs, like crocodiles, and instead they had legs under their body, they were endotherms. This reason cannot be justified for expressing that dinosaurs were endotherms as they also needed legs under their body to grow faster.
Finally, the professor argues that besides Harversian canals, there are growth rings in the dinosaurs which their body use for rapid growth. Growth rings means that dinosaurs can grow quicker at warmer temperatures while at colder temperatures there is not any growth or very slow growth rate. This option does not exist in endothermic mammals which can grow steadily in all temperatures ranges, because of Harversian canals which enable them to grow quickly and author thinks that dinosaurs only had these canals.
According to what professors mentions, it is justified to said that dinosaurs were not endotherms, in contrast to what the author mentions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as cold 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...e of dinosaurs were not as much as cold like now. The polar regions were warmer than...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, however, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20955882353 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55380836705 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525735294118 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8210054663 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.083333333 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426044283639 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175608482445 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067789059079 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225295177868 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722989423108 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.