The lecturer talk about the dinosaurs were not the endotherms. In the lecture, he is contradicts the argues present in the reading passage.
Firstly, the lecturer mentions that dinosaurs lived in the polar region which were warmer than today. In fact, during the winter period the dinosaurs migrated in the warmer region for hibernating. The fossil's presence in the polar region does not prove that dinosaurs were endotherms. The lecturer challenges the point made by the reading passage that the dinosaur's fossil found in the polar regions. Since in the colder region dinosaur maintained the body temperature, they were endotherms.
Secondly, the lecturer states that dinosaur had more weight causes the larger size which was responsible for the underneath leg positions. The dinosaur leg position was not at the body's side, as same as crocodile and lizards, and the running activities was not concluded that dinosaurs were endotherms. The lecturer casts doubt the argues made by the reading passage that a leg position underneath the body and physical activity such as running quickly suggest that dinosaurs were endotherms.
Thirdly, the lecturer claims that dinosaurs had Harversian canals as well as growth ring which helped to thicken the bone and rapid growth of bones. The slow and rapid growth of the bone depend on the growth rings. The lecturer refutes the point made by the reading passage that presence of Harvasian canal which was helped the growth of the bones and make the stronger bone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fossils'' or 'fossil's'?
Suggestion: fossils'; fossil's
... the warmer region for hibernating. The fossils presence in the polar region does not p...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'dinosaurs'' or 'dinosaur's'?
Suggestion: dinosaurs'; dinosaur's
...nt made by the reading passage that the dinosaurs fossil found in the polar regions. Sinc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, third, thirdly, well, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1762295082 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51991196849 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454918032787 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 379.8 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.5116640707 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1538461538 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373745241238 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160708746188 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914574110945 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225679221976 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917687581255 0.0443174109184 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.