The reading and the speaker discussing about the hydrogen based fuel engine but in very contrasts ways. The lecture refutes the all points made in the reading passage.
Firstly, reading passage says that hydrogen easily available in the environment, In water plenty of hydrogen available and from the atmosphere. Further oil resource are finite and limited, someday, we may be lacking oil. But the lecture refutes this point by saying that even though hydrogen is renewable source still, the process making liquid hydrogen from the water is complex, further it has to keep it in -253 degree temperature it is highly difficulty to make things in laboratory.
Secondly, reading passage states that it reduce the pollution and attract the people because it produces less carbon dioxide in the environment. Again, speaker contrasts this by explaining the purification process for liquid hydrogen which need lots of coal to burn that make make create the environment pollution due carbon dioxide releasing in the atmosphere.
Thirdly, reading passage argues that using this technique causes very less price for car when compare to the oil engines. Still, the professor opposes this point by stating that in order to run the hydrogen fuel engine then it should be made up of platinum and it is so costly, moreover, engine which made with cheaper material for the hydrogen engine not succeeded so far.
To sum up, professor contrasts all points made in reading passage like it can be environment friendly, economical and renewable resources by giving some logical evidence he refutes these points.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Firstly, reading passage says that hydrogen easily available in the environ...
^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ogen available and from the atmosphere. Further oil resource are finite and limited, so...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...speaker contrasts this by explaining the purification process for liquid hydrogen...
^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: make
...en which need lots of coal to burn that make make create the environment pollution due ca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gical evidence he refutes these points.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'third', 'thirdly', 'as to', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.284697508897 0.261695866417 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.160142348754 0.158904122519 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0747330960854 0.0723426182421 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0604982206406 0.0435111971325 139% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0355871886121 0.0277247811725 128% => OK
Prepositions: 0.11743772242 0.128828473217 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0604982206406 0.0370669169778 163% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56974360374 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0213523131673 0.0208969081088 102% => OK
Particles: 0.00355871886121 0.00154638098197 230% => OK
Determiners: 0.106761565836 0.128158765124 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0106761565836 0.0158828679856 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106761565836 0.0114777025283 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1620.0 1645.83664459 98% => OK
No of words: 257.0 271.125827815 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.30350194553 6.08160592843 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.447470817121 0.374372842146 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.326848249027 0.287516216867 114% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.198443579767 0.187439937562 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.120622568093 0.113142543107 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56974360374 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536964980545 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 52.2447889253 53.8517498576 97% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 25.7 21.7502111507 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2794991194 49.3711431718 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.0 132.220823453 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 21.7502111507 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 0.878197800319 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 58.3848249027 50.5018328374 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.80555555556 1.90840788429 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489670301499 0.549887131256 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.155546749869 0.142949733639 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0896373840879 0.0787303798458 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.716659019054 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.201160188669 0.139662658121 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.241585210715 0.266732575781 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989964000313 0.103435571967 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.31661025472 0.414875509568 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.101488140745 0.0530846634433 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307881569329 0.40443939384 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122861861236 0.0528353158467 233% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.