TPO 1 - Intergrated:
4 days working instead of 5 day
In the reading, the author claims that four-day working day, with less payment, is more efficient rather than five days working day which is the way currently exist by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the lecturer casts doubt on what is presented in the text and demonstrate some evidences to the contrary.
At first, the author argues that four days working leads to generating more income due to a reduction in both payroll expenditures and costly human errors. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that the new workforce necessitates further expenses including training and medical insurance, whereas the medical cost has nothing to do with the length of time that personnel works. Consequently, all the expenses will not cut off by the 80%. Moreover, the more employees work, the more office space and equipment such as computers need. Undoubtedly, all of these items deteriorate the financial status of the companies owing to a fall in profits.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that on the country scale, a drop in unemployment rates is accounted as a constructive consequences of this approach. On the other hand, the lecturer, disputes this point by clarifying that according to the facts mentioned regarding the companies' reluctant to not have extra workers, having worked less time, the current staffs are required to work overtime since the employers presume they should do the same duties which had been assign in five days working. Therefore, not only does not this decision decrease the unemployment rate, but also it makes the current employees much less contentment of their job.
Finally, the author asserts enhance the quality of their personal life as they have more time to allocate their favorable activities. The lecturer, though, dismisses it by pointing out that the stability in jobs gradually has been adversely affected by rising the the possibility of firing out. Beside this issue that the employees who work 4 days instead of 5 days pass up their chance for promotions because employers opt to offer this opportunity to those who work more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
...nt rates is accounted as a constructive consequences of this approach. On the other hand, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...y has been adversely affected by rising the the possibility of firing out. Beside this ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...y has been adversely affected by rising the the possibility of firing out. Beside this ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, whereas, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 352.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13920454545 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74701513207 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 145.348785872 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605113636364 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 419.366225166 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.5045266956 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.153846154 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0769230769 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266917959476 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788963125092 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125242818776 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172846782392 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920951690055 0.0443174109184 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.